Speed-Zone 10:
Willow Creek, Klamath River, Cottonwood Creek

Just like Black Butte to Edgewood, this part of the route is a slow run. Looking at the line in modern times, there does not seem to be much reason for it. It is best explained with the technology of 1885. Tunnels and valley bridges are expensive items even today, but modern machinery allows to move soil rather efficiently.

Workers create a cut with shovels.
A cut of the Siskiyou Line near the Oregon border, as it had to be created back then.

While many locations within this speed zone are good candidates for such improvement, these aren't at the top of the list within an incremental upgrade process. There is a possibility, though, that priorities could change. The author has heard of very low speed restrictions after extended periods of rainfall, affecting the track along Willow Creek and Klamath River. This could be a simple drainage problem, solved in the normal process of ballast cleaning with a subgrade protection layer, plus revitalisation of drainage devices. If the whole slope down to a river has a drainage problem, the issue could be more severe. In that case, alignment improvements in these sections should get moved to the top of the list.

The track uses the tiny valley of the Willow Creek, which meanders through grass hills. With 6 inches of superelevation and 9 inches of unbalanced superelevation, 46 mph is the achievable speed. If the alignment would be upgraded, using more bridges and the full width of the valley, the geometry of the valley might allow 60 - 70 mph without long tunnels.

The track along the Klamath River does not follow its gentle flow. Instead, it has several sharp edges - short curves with tight radius. Using today's machinery instead of 1880's shovels, straigthening out these edges is expected to be cheap. Again, there is a limit: As soon as the track is supposed to get straighter than the river, upgrade costs will rise sharply. Adapting to the landscape might allow 70 mph as a goal for the waterlevel track along the Klamath River.

4 freight locos on riverside track.
The Klamath River does not curve sharply. The waterlevel track does nonetheless.

In the traffic concept of 1880s Southern Pacific, Hornbrook was the helper attachment station. Few miles north of this small town, the grade steepens to 3.3%. For any upgrade scenario, the following limits have to be considered:

  1. The example trains won't reach more than 60 mph. While the grade is normal for modern highspeed lines, the situation on such lines is different: The trains arrive at the bottom with a speed of 186 mph.
  2. Even with more powerful locos, as suggested, freight trains won't exceed 25 mph. This means, that eased curves have to be calculated with rather low superelevation.

On the positive side, major parts of the track along Cottonwood Creek use a wide valley and are close to straight.

Freight train in wide valley.
The Siskiyou Line in northernmost California.

For timetable calculation, no changes to the alignment are assumed.

Achievable timing
Location Distance ...added up  Time elapsed Coast Starlight Average speed ...added up
MP 406.3 21 mi (34 km) 301 mi (485 km) 00:28 05:00 - 45 mph (73 km/h) 60 mph (97 km/h)
Willow Bridge 32 mi (52 km) 280 mi (451 km) 00:29 04:32 - 67 mph (108 km/h) 62 mph (99 km/h)
Edgewood 5 mi (8 km) 248 mi (399 km) 00:07 04:03 - 43 mph (69 km/h) 61 mph (98 km/h)
Weed 0 243 mi (392 km) 00:01 03:56 - - 62 mph (99 km/h)
Weed 4 mi (7 km) 243 mi (392 km) 00:06 03:55 - 42 mph (68 km/h) 62 mph (100 km/h)
Black Butte 12 mi (19 km) 239 mi (385 km) 00:14 03:49 - 52 mph (84 km/h) 63 mph (101 km/h)
Azalea 11 mi (18 km) 227 mi (365 km) 00:21 03:35 - 32 mph (52 km/h) 63 mph (102 km/h)
Dunsmuir 0 216 mi (348 km) 00:01 03:14 05:05 - 67 mph (108 km/h)
Dunsmuir 26 mi (42 km) 216 mi (348 km) 00:44 03:13 ??:?? 36 mph (58 km/h) 67 mph (108 km/h)
MP 296 30 mi (48 km) 189 mi (304 km) 00:36 02:30 - 51 mph (82 km/h) 76 mph (122 km/h)
Redding 0 159 mi (256 km) 00:02 01:54 03:15 - 84 mph (135 km/h)
Redding 25 mi (40 km) 159 mi (256 km) 00:17 01:52 ??:?? 89 mph (143 km/h) 85 mph (137 km/h)
MP 233 10 mi (16 km) 134 mi (216 km) 00:09 01:35 - 68 mph (109 km/h) 84 mph (135 km/h)
Red Bluff 0 124 mi (200 km) 00:01 01:27 - - 86 mph (138 km/h)
Red Bluff 39 mi (63 km) 124 mi (200 km) 00:26 01:26 - 91 mph (146 km/h) 87 mph (140 km/h)
Chico 0 85 mi (136 km) 00:01 01:00 01:56 - 85 mph (137 km/h)
Chico 44 mi (71 km) 85 mi (136 km) 00:29 00:59 ??:?? 91 mph (146 km/h) 87 mph (140 km/h)
Marysville WP 0 41 mi (66 km) 00:02 00:30 - - 86 mph (138 km/h)
Marysville WP 41 mi (66 km) 41 mi (66 km) 00:28 00:28 - 90 mph (145 km/h) 90 mph (145 km/h)
Sacramento 0 mi (0 km) 0 mi (0 km) 00:00 00:00 00:00 0 mph (0 km/h) 0 mph (0 km/h)

The suggested upgrades would save 5 minutes of travel time within this speed zone.

Freight train in mountaineous terrain.
After crossing the border to Oregon, the valley gets narrow and steep.

Another option for infrastructure upgrade is a bypass, eliminating the northernmost part of track in the Shasta Valley, the track along Willow Creek, and along the Klamath River. This would shorten the route, allow high speed and allow to save a major amount of time. Unfortunately, passenger numbers supporting such investment into several miles of tunnel are not expected by the author.



Unit conversion for text on this page.
6 inches 152 mm  
9 inches unbalanced superelevation 230 mm unbalanced superelevation 1.5 m/s2 unbalanced lateral acceleration
46 mph 74 km/h  
60 mph 97 km/h  
70 mph 113 km/h  
186 mph 300 km/h  
25 mph 40 km/h  

about this document            Hans-Joachim Zierke            © notice            Thank you


Last modified: 2003-10-01